thanks for the input... appreciated.
The car in question is the one at wickedkit. The other one mentioned in autotrader last year, is a different car. That one was being sold by a main dealer on behalf of a customer who wouldn't take a PX.
Ultra low miles was my priority, but as Brownbear pointed out, that may be a problem given the cars age. Never thought about that implecation.
If you don't mind me asking, why is low-miles an issue (over and above the fact that it's always nice to have the freshest car you can afford)? I'm not saying you're wrong, just trying to understand your priorities..
NSX's aren't inherently unreliable cars - a car with 50K on it can be just as good or better than one with 20K, no less prone to go wrong and cheaper too!
I agree with Joe the Brown Bear. A car with higher miles, as long as it has an exemplary FSH shouldn't be a concern. Most of the miles were probably done on the motorway, although I gather the NSX is an excellent day-to-day choice. Either way, as long as it's been looked after, had the right oil changes etc. I wouldn't worry too much.
A recent article I read stated that a FSH was more important than mileage.
Also remember that a car like the NSX was built to an extremely high standard with very high tolerances - what seem like high miles for a BMW, Saab, Ford etc. shouldn't be such a concern for an NSX. Ferrari/Maserati it 'aint!!
I bought a 1998 car with about 85k miles on it. That averages at about 12000 miles/year. If I do 3000 miles/year for the next 5 years that makes an average of about 7,700 miles/year for the age of the car. I suppose my point is that if you only intend to use it on nice sunny weekends, the initial high mileage issue will become a non-issue over time.
I do about 12k miles p.a. and I lack self discipline. I bought a R34 GTR with the intention of using it for week ends and social outings, even went out and bought a Golf GTI as an every day car.(this was in the good old days before the latest company car tax rules) Two years on, the 34 had 20k on the clock. Just couldn't help myself.Originally Posted by BrownBear
Nothing wrong with that at all - they're there to be driven.
Thing is, you pay a premium for very low mileage cars which you know you're going to then 'spend' (ie: lose in depreciation) if you put lots of miles on it. If you buy a car with 50K+ miles, you can put another 20-30K on it and the depreciation will be much much less (as long as you service it, etc).
"quote: seems massively overpriced to me
Are you sure? Some people would be willing to pay a premium for a 'original' version of the car with only 11,000 miles? OK the dealer is putting it up for a profit, so there's some leeway on the price, you can be sure... "
The car does seem far too expensive, expecially for an import which will have a service history in Japanese. As others say, there is little you can do to verify the mileage. By way of comparison, I recently bought a one owner 1996 coupe manual with 7000 dry miles on it from a main dealer. Although there is a risk with such cars 'drying out', the fact that the cosmetic condition was like new, including underneath, meant a premium was worth paying. But, the final price I paid was not very much more than the import is up for. There are good UK cars out there, and mileage should not be an issue, but you have to look around to ensure you get the best. If you told me last year that I would have found a mint pop-up lights model for under £30k I'd have told you that it wasn't possible. But it was.
Clive
:wink:
Hey guys,
I've taken my NSX from 50k miles, to its current tally of 135k miles.
Honestly now - I would say, dont care a jot about how many miles are on the dial, just check the condition of the car and service history.
I say that from the experience of driving my high mileage car every day, but a couple of months ago, I decided to look at a later 'low' mileage car.
Without reservation, I left knowing my old beast was a MUCH better car than the newer car I tested.
Good luck,
Ben
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote