Yes an old clip, but always makes me smile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU4xD...eature=related
NSX vs 355
Yes an old clip, but always makes me smile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU4xD...eature=related
You do know that it is the S-Zero though,and not a standard NSX,don't you?Originally Posted by gumball
92 brown/blue/gold manual coupe sadly stolen:
96 Brooklands Green manual T-top.Sadly now sold
04 Formula Red manual coupe Very sadly sold
Still 100hp down on the Ferrari.
In a straight line...Is there much difference between the S-Zero and standard NSX?
SS
Lexus LC500h.......New Daily run around with some saving the Planet thoughts
Black/black 95 NSX NA with mk1 Ary exhaust....Now sold
Red/Black 91 NSX treasure.....FINo more NA
Silver/Pearl White/Black 1993 NSX 3.0 5 MT NSX ZAZ R-GT Twin Scroll Turbo
Theoretically the standard one might be a match due to softer suspension allowing increased rearward weight transfer.
Yeah, that's accurate Honda horses versus complete-fabrication Italian horses though.
At how biased the Japanese are?
As above, the 355 makes nowhere near the power that Ferrari say, and the NSX generally makes more, added to that is the 355 being generally rubbish
And how much better the 360 is,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn20TOXwNco&NR=1
Harsh. They might not make all 380hp that Ferrari claimed but in reality they are faster than any standard NSX. IMO they are still the best looking mid engined Ferrari so farAs above, the 355 makes nowhere near the power that Ferrari say, and the NSX generally makes more, added to that is the 355 being generally rubbish
Differant car, differant driver, differant day loooots of variables. Look at the times, the Blue Type S records a quicker time than the theoretically faster IOP S Zero.
No question the 360 is a "better" car than the 355 but it's regarded by many Ferraristi as a bit of a duffer in the usual good (430, 355, 328) then bad (360, 348, 308) Ferrari cycle.
Cheers
Mark
The older I get, the faster I was
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
